MILITARY

Russia says nuclear missile it claims can destroy Texas ‘almost ready’ for service

January 19th, 2021

Russia is nearing completion of its new RS-28 Sarmat missile, also known as the SS-X-30 “Satan II” missile. Russia has previously claimed the missile can carry more warheads than any other missile, and destroy an area the size of Texas or France.

In his annual press conference in December, Russian President Vladimir Putin said the new missile is nearly finished, saying, “We are in the final stages.”

In 2016, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), an international nuclear watchdog, reported the Sarmat may be able to carry as many as 10 heavy nuclear warheads or 15 medium warheads, potentially allowing the missile to disperse multiple nuclear blasts across a wide area. By comparison, the U.S. LGM-30G Minuteman III can carry up to three nuclear warheads.

The Russian military news station TV Zvezda reported at the time that the missile would be able to destroy an area the size of Texas.

On Dec. 30, Russian Deputy Minister of Defence Alexey Krivoruchko told the Russian military newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda that tests had confirmed the Sarmat’s ability to carry payloads of warheads and said, “In the near future, we will begin flight tests of this missile system.”

It is unclear when flight tests for the Sarmat missile may begin. Russia has conducted several tests of its nuclear missiles in recent months, including a sea test of its 3M-22 Tsirkon (Zircon) missile, capable of flying at speeds in excess of Mach 8, or about

Alison Training Management


Adding to the potential threat of the missiles, TV Zvezda reported in 2016 that the missile’s payload would be able to defeat any country’s missile defense systems.

During his December press conference, Putin said Russia’s move to develop weapons that could overwhelm any missile defense system came as a reaction to efforts to improve U.S. missile defense systems in recent years.

“One country started building an umbrella for itself. What did this mean? This would have made our nuclear capability completely irrelevant,” Putin said. “What were we supposed to do? We had to do everything we could to prevent this: either build a missile defense shield on our own, or develop systems that would not be affected by these missile defenses. This is what we did in developing hypersonic weapons.”

At the same press year-end conference, Putin claimed Russia is “already in” a new arms race with the U.S. and said it has been since the U.S. backed out of a missile defense treaty. Putin did not say which missile defense treaty he was referring to, but President Donald Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in February of 2019. According to the Washington Examiner, Putin may have actually been referring to the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty, which President George W. Bush withdrew from in 2002.

Curated By

Silas Vane
Senior CIA Operative/Intelligence Officer | National Security Analyst | Foreign Affairs Correspondent/Senior International Reporter | Strategic Intelligence Consultant
Silas Vane brings three decades of intelligence expertise to bear on today's most pressing geopolitical realities. A former senior operative with extensive field experience, Silas approaches journalism through the unvarnished lens of Realpolitik, where national interest trumps sentiment, and sovereignty matters more than social media trends. His analysis cuts through cultural noise to expose the underlying power structures shaping our world. While others chase viral stories, Silas examines what truly threatens or strengthens nations. His perspective may be unwelcome in fashionable circles, but it remains indispensable for those who prefer strategic clarity over diplomatic euphemisms. Drawing from classified insights and boots-on-the-ground reality, his commentaries prioritize substance over style, security over sensitivity, and eternal vigilance over naive optimism. In an era of manufactured crises and performative outrage, Silas offers readers what they need: unflinching assessments of where power truly lies, who wields it, and what it means for America's place in an increasingly dangerous world. His work demands attention not because it aligns with popular opinion, but because ignoring hard truths rarely produces favorable outcomes. For those seeking comfort over competence, look elsewhere, Silas speaks only to those prepared to face inconvenient realities.

Suggested Reading

15 Minutes: General Curtis LeMay and the Countdown to Nuclear Annihilation

During the Cold War, a flight crew had 15 minutes to get their nuke-laden plane in the air from the moment Soviet bombers were detected―15 minutes between the earliest warning of an incoming nuclear strike and the first flash of an enemy warhead. This is the chilling true story of the incredibly ris...

Rockets and Missiles: The Life Story of a Technology

Beginning with World War II, missiles transformed the art of war. For the first time, cities of warring nations were vulnerable to sudden, unannounced, long-distance destruction. At the same time, rockets made possible one of the great triumphs of the modern age--the exploration of space. Rockets an...

Thor Ballistic Missile: The United States and the United Kingdom in Partnership

In the mid-1950s faced with worrying advances in Soviet missile technology, the United States sought to develop an IRBM to act as a stop-gap until the Atlas ICBM became operational. Intense inter-service rivalry followed before the US Air Force gained the upper hand in deploying the missile. The UK,...

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By continuing to browse, you accept our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.