Synopsis
"Un-Rigging the 2024 Election: Was the 2020 Election Stolen?" by Steve Zbigniew Szczepanski is a provocative book that delves into the contentious debate surrounding the integrity of the 2020 U.S. presidential election, while also proposing measures to safeguard the 2024 election. The author, a chemical engineer with a master’s degree and an attorney specializing in intellectual property litigation, leverages his background in statistical analysis and legal reasoning to argue that the 2020 election was marred by significant irregularities that amounted to theft. Szczepanski contends that a substantial portion of the American public—ranging from one-third to two-thirds, depending on the source—believes the 2020 election was stolen, a claim he asserts has been unfairly demonized rather than thoroughly investigated. His book aims to bring evidence to the forefront, challenging the official narrative and asserting that key swing states violated the U.S. Constitution’s Electors Clause and state election codes, which he argues had a decisive impact on the election’s outcome.
The book’s central thesis revolves around defining a "stolen" election by drawing an analogy to a refereed contest, such as a sports game, where a referee’s failure to follow the rules can determine the winner. Szczepanski applies this framework to the 2020 election, examining whether judges, as the "referees" of the electoral process, correctly applied election laws in several swing states. He argues that judicial failures to adhere to legal standards were outcome-determinative, thus constituting a stolen election. The author meticulously lays out his case in a legalistic manner, presenting evidence that he believes demonstrates violations of constitutional and state election laws. He also critiques the U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal to consider evidence presented by then-President Donald Trump’s legal team, attributing this to questionable procedural grounds. Szczepanski suggests that these oversights enabled systemic flaws to persist, undermining public faith in the electoral system.
Beyond analyzing the 2020 election, the book proposes actionable solutions to restore electoral integrity for the 2024 election. Szczepanski advocates for lawsuits and amendments to presidential election laws to address vulnerabilities exposed in 2020. He emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in the electoral process, arguing that fair elections are the bedrock of a democratic republic. The book includes detailed discussions of specific irregularities, such as procedural lapses in swing states and statistical anomalies that the author claims point to manipulation. Written in a style accessible to the general reader, Szczepanski’s work avoids overly technical jargon, making complex legal and statistical arguments comprehensible. He positions his analysis as a call to action, urging readers to consider the evidence and support reforms to prevent future electoral disputes.
While the book boldly challenges the mainstream narrative, it has sparked polarized reactions. Supporters praise its detailed evidence and clear argumentation, viewing it as a compelling exposé of electoral flaws. Critics, however, may dismiss it as partisan, arguing that its claims align with unproven allegations of widespread fraud, which have been repeatedly debunked by election officials and courts. Szczepanski acknowledges the divisive nature of the topic, noting the societal rift between those who believe the election was stolen and those who reject such claims outright. Ultimately, "Un-Rigging the 2024 Election" seeks to provoke thoughtful discussion about election integrity, encouraging readers to critically examine the evidence and advocate for a more robust and transparent electoral system moving forward.